Who is behind piracy

Until these conditions are met, we will continue to attack them. According to a former MEND leader amnestied by the government, oil companies and local authorities are obstructing the rights of communities to claim their rights. True statements that seemed to go unheard or dismissed by the various parties involved as the exploitation continued — and hence, so have the attacks.

Today, there are around ten armed groups operating in the area with sophisticated military equipment. They also have a good knowledge of the delta, where they are involved in brigandage, mainly focused on oil assets, including pipeline sabotage, but their main activity takes place in international waters. Pirates in the Niger Delta mainly target medium-sized tankers that come to take supplies off the Nigerian coast.

While the hijacking of tankers is one of the best-known activities, the kidnapping of crew members remains the largest and most lucrative.

The fisherman, deprived of their livelihood by foreign IUU fishing vessels, resorted instead to maritime piracy and so a criminal enterprise was born. Attempting to solve one problem without understanding the associated threats in other maritime and land-based spheres often results in failure - Philip Barber, I.

However, the former are frequently turned off and the latter can be, and are, tampered with. The use of artificial intelligence within the systems enables the most advanced to identify, through satellite tracking, those vessels displaying high-threat behaviour and then highlight them to an operator.

The use of unmanned aerial vehicles, or UAVs, and more record-driven traceability of fish stocks are further ways to meet illegal maritime activities at the start line, rather than the pirate-ravaged finish line, but only when complemented by real-time communication between international agencies and non-governmental organisations such as the IMB.

While piracy poses a clear physical threat to the global shipping industry out at sea, a host of additional economic risks also threaten international trade and supply chains.

This argument is shaky in the sense that it undermines a lot of economic principles, but makes a good point to show that a vast majority of downloads would have never happened if not for piracy, so its not necessary a lost sale to the artist [4]. That being said it is hardly a justification for piracy, but instead an interesting approach to the consumer ideology of piracy.

The last question to be asked regarding piracy is what can be done? To ruin someones life with prison and debt from stealing 30 songs may be seen as excessive by a society that actively engages in piracy. I would suggest a change in the laws, replacing these fines with a fee such as when someone is caught speeding. A slap on the wrist and an inconvenient fine, not incarceration and crippling debt.

It is not just the consumers who understands the power piracy has, but even the copyright holders are beginning to accept the new piracy-based industry. Some artists have already taken a firm stand and are attempting to fight against this illegal sharing, but others are embracing and adapting to the new industry.

Those who are adapting are the smarter of the two sides, for it is clear that piracy is going no where fast, and that digital copyright still faces an uphill battle to achieving protection. Forbes Magazine, 21 Jan. You must be logged in to post a comment.

Citation: [1] Kain, Erik. Here, finding a local attorney is a must. However, even if your trial is in a federal court, a lawyer that specializes in copyright law may provide you with a variety of defenses and options. There are two aspects that determine whether or not the federal government will file felony charges against copyright infringers.

Firstly, the scope of the violation. Secondly, the strength of the case. To clarify, federal authorities will not prosecute criminal offenders unless they commit a serious violation such as selling or distributing pirated materials.

Otherwise, infringers are more likely to face civil charges, if any at all. Moreover, federal prosecutors handle cases that have strong evidence. For example, a court charged you with civil penalties. After that, if you continue to break piracy laws, the federal government may step in.

Your previous convictions provides them with a solid case and potentially key pieces of evidence, especially when you commit other crimes. Similarly, if you have a strong defense or justification such as the fair use doctrine , the federal government will likely not file charges. However, perhaps most importantly, illegal downloading laws give federal authorities the right to prosecute all types of violators, even first-time infringers and cases without solid evidence.

In other words, the scope of your violation and your defense only define the likelihood of whether or not you will face criminal charges. Otherwise, the federal government can still prosecute anyone who breaks piracy laws. The fines for illegal downloading are hefty in civil and criminal cases, alike, although the latter tends to be more punishing. In it, they notify violators of their wrongdoing and demand that they immediately halt their illegal actions. Willfulness is a key factor that determines whether or not the federal government will prosecute someone.

People must take piracy laws seriously. Otherwise, they can end up with a lawsuit, civil charges, and, at times, a federal prosecution. Repeat offenders and those who profit from copyright infringement are more likely to go to trial for criminal, felony-level violations.

Furthermore, each state has its own way of monitoring and enforcing illegal downloading laws. Some of them are even more strict that the federal government. Nonetheless, regardless of whose laws you break, the fines for illegal downloading are hefty.

Similarly, felony-level violations could land you with a years if not decades long prison sentence. Going forward, felons must understand the charges that are being brought against them. After that, they can define the type of legal help that they need and potential defenses. The fair use doctrine and statute of limitations are both valid justifications in court. At the end of the day, the scope of your infringement, your legal history, and the type of prosecution that you face will define your case.

Some may be able to prove their innocence, while others may only have the option of negotiating a lower settlement and reducing their fines for illegal downloading. You must be logged in to post a comment. Illegal Downloading Laws: The Basics While federal and state rules may treat this issue differently, there are common concepts that apply across the board.