Should i use asp.net

NET aka "System. Web" is now dead. NET, but bypassed most of the WebForms infrastructure. What is the advantage of. NET core? Advantages of ASP. Cross Platform - ASP. NET core faster than. NET framework? Net Core framework is much faster, easier to learn, modular, platform-independent, cross-platform, open-source application development platform. Net or ASP. NET is a very popular framework for developing windows based application which runs on windows environment but applications developed using.

When should I use. Developers Should Use. Microservices are being used. NET applications are compiled, which means the code is translated into object code, which is then executed. This compilation process takes a small amount of time, but happens only once. After compilation, the code can be executed over and over by the. Net platform very quickly. Interpreted code is not directly executed by the machine, but must be read and interpreted each time before being executed.

Compiled code is usually faster and more scalable than interpreted code, and can do anything interpreted code can do. The compilation process also provides validation that all of the code is consistent. For example, if a method named GetUser is renamed to GetEmployee as part of some code updates, any reference to GetUser throughout the rest of the application will cause an error during compilation, making it easy to identify and fix.

Interpreted languages would not identify this error until the code is actually run and tested. In a large application, it is very time consuming to manually test every scenario, or to write and maintain additional code that tests of every scenario, whenever code is changed. Software cost is an important factor when developing a website. It used to be that developers had to buy expensive software called Integrated Development Environments, or IDEs in order to build applications.

These days, most code can be written using free tools. Companies with more than 5 developers must purchase a license to use Visual Studio, but the cost is competitive with professional IDEs for other platforms.

Microsoft also provides Visual Studio Code, a lighter-weight IDE and editor, which is free for everyone, including corporations. It's one of Microsoft's oldest. NET technologies, which means that it's also the most updated and mature as well. It also means that more companies have built their infrastructure on this particular technology stack than in the newer ones, such as. NET Web Pages. Just for reference, most of the websites that I have worked on professionally have relied on ASP. Most were relatively older websites that were successful financially and still going strong.

It makes sense that a website has been around for 10 years, will be more successful usually than one which has been around for years. Personally speaking, I still use Web Forms for many of my projects as I have built a very robust and stable library around it as well. And that's because Web Forms get one thing right that many other frameworks fail to succeed in. And that's in the fact that it is incredibly easy to setup a Web Forms project.

Which is its biggest selling point to this day. Rapid development is still a popular design pattern and certain frameworks are better at it than others. Every page in a Web Forms project is comprised of 2 files. The markup file, which contains your HTML along with pre-built web controls as mentioned earlier, and the server-side bounded page that handles any and all server logic and events, like reading from a database or validating API private keys.

If for example, you have a button on the page that when clicked validates a login, you can simply create click event-handler and let the framework worry about creating the actual HTTP request and response logic. All you have to do is to worry about coding the server logic.

And best of all, the server-side page has access to the server and to any resource in the. NET framework. NET Web Forms are also very hackable, in a sense. You don't have to use the actual Web Form technology if you do not want to. You can bypass all server controls and simply have a regular AJAX-driven app. But if you want to stick to the environment and use the many associated tools, there are also dozens of pre-built components a drag and drop away.

Web Forms also include templating controls through the MasterPage layout system, which means that you can set up generic code and controls by adding a single-file to your project and associating it as the 'parent' of other pages.

And because every Web Forms page inherits from the System. Page class, this also means that you can easily implement your own Page classes with your own logic as well. So needless to say, there is alot to like here. But due to its age, ASP. NET Web Forms have had a difficult time keeping up with the latest modalities in software development. So it might not fit every use case that you encounter. NET Core is one of the key components of.

Both frameworks have an MVC approach to coding and both use a very similar Razor templating language. NET Standard with either. Are not afraid of learning new things.

Are not afraid of breaking and fixing things since ASP. NET Core is not fully matured yet. Need a stable environment to work in. Have nearer release schedules. Are already working on an existing app and extending its functionality.

Already have an existing team with ASP.